Legal Opinion

State v. Cole

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

Decided April 12, 1921No. Indictment, No. 19PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPennewill, C. J.

We decline to grant the motion for binding instructions.

The accused denied any knowledge of the existence of a conspiracy to cheat or defraud the county, and offered the evidence of Furman G. Cole, who assumed full responsibility for the scheme by which the county’s money was embezzled. There was also ■ evidence as to the good reputation of accused for honesty, fair dealing and general observance of the law.

During the progress of the trial, and before the state had rested, an article appeared in a newspaper of general circulation in New Castle county, in which it was stated that, the state…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. People v. FeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. People v. Fong SingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. People v. LubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  5. Brown v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BiterSuperior Court of Delaware · 1955
  2. Fleetwood v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. State v. HalkoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963
  4. Walls v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  5. People v. FlanaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API