Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sherman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1956No. Appeal, 178PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

Albert Jay Sherman was indicted in the court below on a charge of fraudulent conversion, as proscribed by Section 834 of The Penal Code. Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, 18 PS 4834. He pleaded not guilty, waived jury trial, and was convicted by the trial judge. A motion in arrest of judgment was overruled, sentence was imposed, and this appeal followed. The factual situation is set forth in the following excerpt from the lower court’s opinion:

“In the summer of 1951, the prosecutors, husband and wife, contacted the defendant for the purpose of purchasing a taproom with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Pearl Assurance Co. v. National Insurance Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Commonwealth v. SchusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Wagner v. MarcusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Commonwealth v. SpiegelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PrepSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Commonwealth v. DunnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Frank A. Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  4. Commonwealth v. StahlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Commonwealth v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API