Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stahl

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 1956No. Appeal, 187PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

The defendant in this appeal financed the purchase and sales of used ears through the Pottstown Finance Company. In order to obtain money, titles to the vehicles were transferred to the finance company accompanied by judgment notes and bailment leases. When the used car market suffered a set back, the defendant became financially embarrassed and failed to meet his obligations. In the instant case, four cars were involved. He was requested to repay the money due or return the cars, but he was unable to do either. It is admitted that the finance company did business with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SchusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Commonwealth v. OverheimSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Commonwealth v. BixlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Commonwealth v. MitchneckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Commonwealth v. HillpotSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KauffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Commonwealth v. CowardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API