Legal Opinion

Hess Collection Winery v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 2006No. C046405PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1591Opinion

SIMS, J.

This case involves a challenge to the constitutionality of mandatory interest arbitration statutes applicable to agricultural employers. (Lab. Code, § 1164 et seq.; undesignated section references are to the Labor Code.)

After agricultural employer The Hess Collection Winery (Hess) and United Food and Commercial Workers Union (Union) failed to agree on the terms of an initial collective bargaining agreement, a private mediator determined the terms of a contract by which the parties would be bound, pursuant to section 1164 et seq. The Agricultural Labor Relations Board (the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. County of Sonoma v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. City of San Jose v. International Assn. of Firefighters, Local 230California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Santa Clara County Correctional Peace Officers' Ass'n v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API