Legal Opinion

Ruble v. Ruble

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 13, 1951No. 35,380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Justice.

Plaintiff and defendant, brothers, are the owners of undivided interests in certain real property in Willmar. This action was brought to compel defendant to convey his 4/14 interest to plaintiff.

In the fall of 1946, defendant orally offered to sell to plaintiff his interest in the property for $8,000 cash or $2,500 cash and the balance on payments. Before acting on defendant’s offer, plaintiff sold a house in Minneapolis in order to raise the money. On November 29, 1946, he wrote defendant:

“I came up from Mpls two days ago to see you but cant find you so am writing my…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. HoagSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Langellier v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Bennett v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Kileen v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Lewis v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Minar v. SkoogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Smith v. HolmwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Smith v. HolmwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API