Legal Opinion

State v. Wickline

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1992No. S-90-1135, S-90-1136PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

This is a consolidated appeal from judgments of the district court denying defendant’s motions for postconviction relief from his convictions of one charge of theft and one charge of burglary. We affirm.

“In an appeal involving a proceeding for postconviction relief the trial court’s findings will be upheld unless such findings are clearly erroneous.” State v. Gildea, 240 Neb. 780, 782, 484 N.W.2d 467, 468 (1992).

Lee Wickline, the defendant, was charged in separate informations with theft and burglary, and he was convicted of both charges. The two convictions were affirmed on direct appeal.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. StahlNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. WicklineNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. PaulsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. HawthorneNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. NielsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. LindsayNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. BowenNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API