Legal Opinion

State v. Wickline

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1989No. 88-687, 88-688PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This is a consolidated appeal taken from the Holt County District Court, where defendant, Lee Wickline, was charged by information on April 19, 1988, with burglary, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-507(1) (Reissue 1985). On May 3,1988, the defendant filed motions to suppress pretrial and courtroom identification and to suppress certain physical evidence. These motions were denied in journal entries filed May 16 and 20, 1988.

On May 17, 1988, a second information was filed, charging the defendant with the additional crime of theft, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-511(1) (Reissue 1985),…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. CulverNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. BuckmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. State v. PorterNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. BowenNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API