Legal Opinion

MFD Partners v. Murphy

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1992No. 16154PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*510OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WATANABE, J.

Defendant-Appellant Patrick W. Murphy (Defendant) urges us to conclude that he was the “successful party” at the trial below and, therefore, the First Circuit Court erred when it denied his post-judgment request for attorneys’ fees and costs. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant rented commercial space at the Amfac Center, a building managed by Plaintiff MFD Partners (MFD). The lease agreement (master lease) between the parties provided for renegotiation of the rents effective March 1,1989. In the interim, however, Defendant sublet portions of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Food Pantry, Ltd. v. Waikiki Business Plaza, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Three-Seventy Leasing Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Ampex Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. Western Decor & Furnishings Industries, Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Odziemek v. WeselyIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Miles v. F.E.R.M. Enterprices, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Daily Gazette Co. v. West Virginia Development OfficeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kamaka v. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & StifelHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Fought & Co. v. Steel Engineering & Erection, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Sierra Club v. Department of Transportation of the StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Shanghai Inv. Co., Inc. v. Alteka Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API