Legal Opinion
Nationwide Asset Services, Inc. v. DuFauchard
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 15, 2008No. C054975PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, Acting P. J.
“No person shall engage in the business . . . of . . . acting as a prorater . . . without first obtaining a license from the commissioner.” (Fin. Code, § 12200.) “A prorater is a person who . . . engages in . . . the business of receiving money or evidences thereof for the purpose of distributing [it] among creditors in payment or partial payment of the obligations of the debtor.” (§ 12002.1, italics added.)
Plaintiffs Nationwide Asset Services, Inc., and Universal Nationwide, L.L.C., petitioned for a writ of administrative mandamus, seeking to vacate a decision of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Camper v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Personal Watercraft Coalition v. Marin County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Sulier v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rehman v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Jhass Group L.L.C. v. Arizona Department of Financial InstitutionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Estrella v. FREEDOM FINANCIAL NETWORK, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011