Legal Opinion
Sulier v. State Personnel Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 2004No. C046695PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBIE, J.
Does Government Code section 3304, subdivision (d) (contained in the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act 1 ) require the California Department of Corrections (CDC) to mail a formal notice of adverse action within one year of the discovery of a correctional officer’s misconduct by someone authorized to investigate that misconduct? No. That statute states the CDC must “notify the public safety officer of its proposed disciplinary action within” that one-year deadline. Because the CDC complied with this statute here, we shall affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL AND…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Allen v. Sully-Miller Contracting Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Metropolitan Water District v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Alameida v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Golden Valley Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mays v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Breslin v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Bettencourt v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Moore v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Neves v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.