Legal Opinion

Rehman v. Department of Motor Vehicles

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 2009No. C060579PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBIE, J.

Plaintiff Atiqur Rehman filed a petition for a writ of mandate seeking an order directing defendant Department of Motor Vehicles (the department) to rescind its suspension of his driver’s license because, with a blood-alcohol content of 0.04 percent or more, he drove a vehicle that requires a commercial driver’s license. (Veh. Code, 1 § 13353.2, subd. (a)(3).) The trial court denied the petition.

On appeal, Rehman contends that while the department can immediately suspend the driver’s license of a person who, with a blood-alcohol content of 0.04 percent or more, drives a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Lake v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Silver v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Nationwide Asset Services, Inc. v. DuFauchardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. County of Sonoma v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. County of Sacramento v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. People v. UffelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. Haywood, California Court of Appeal, 3rd District2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API