Legal Opinion

Legends Bank v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 14, 2012No. SC 91742PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Chief Justice.

The State of Missouri appeals a judgment holding that all provisions of Senate Bill 844, except those relating to procurement, are unconstitutional because they violate the single subject limitation set forth in article III, section 23 of the Missouri Constitution. The Court holds that SB 844 violates article III, section 21, which prohibits changes in the original purpose of a bill. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

FACTS

Senate Bill 844 (SB 844) was introduced as “An Act to amend chapter 37, RSMo, by adding one new section relating to contracts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hammerschmidt v. Boone CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. Rentschler v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  3. St. Louis County v. Prestige Travel, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  4. Missouri Ass'n of Club Executives, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  5. Purcell v. Cape Girardeau County CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. LeBeau v. Commissioners of Franklin CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. Humane Society of the United States v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  3. Missouri Roundtable for Life, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  4. John T. Impey v. Missouri Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. Missouri Electric Cooperatives v. KanderMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API