Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Cape Girardeau County Commission

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 6, 2010No. SC 90383PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

At issue in this case is whether county commissioner Jay Purcell is entitled to a judgment declaring that he and his fellow commissioners violated the Sunshine Law during a closed meeting. This Court affirms the trial court’s judgment in favor of the defendant Cape Girardeau County Commission, as the trial court correctly concluded that Purcell was not entitled to declaratory or injunctive relief. 1

I. Background

Purcell was one of three commissioners on the Cape Girardeau County Commission who met in closed session on April 17, 2008. The commission’s notice for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. City of St. Joseph v. Lake Contrary Sewer DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Estate of Blodgett v. MitchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. Reinecke v. KleinheiderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Medtronic, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Ballard v. City of Creve CoeurMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Missouri Ass'n of Nurse Anesthetists v. State Board of RegistrationSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  4. Legends Bank v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. McAlister v. StrohmeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API