Legal Opinion
Gaynor v. Payne
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 3, 2002No. SC 16648PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The plaintiff, Paul A. Gaynor, in his capacity as administrator of the estate of his mother, *587Mary Catherine lx Gaynor (decedent), appeals1 from the summary judgment rendered against him by the trial court. The plaintiff claims that: (1) despite having personally released the named defendant, S. Giles Payne (defendant), the former executor of the decedent’s estate, of all liability relating to the administration of the estate, he may bring an action against the defendant for mismanagement of the estate; and (2) his claims are not barred by the doctrine of res judicata as…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Appleton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Hertz Corp. v. Federal InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Weiss v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Tappin v. Homecomings Financial Network, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Twenty-Four Merrill Street Condominium Ass'n v. MurrayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Ammirata v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.