Legal Opinion

Ramer v. City of Hoover

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 22, 1983No. 81-820PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case arises out of the annexation of the Riverchase development into the City of Hoover, and the primary issue is whether a landowner had a right to tie-in to a trunk sewer line which ran through his property. The appellant, Richard Ramer, owner of a tract of land through which the sewer passed, contends that the trial court committed numerous errors in this case, but he asks this Court to consider only the most "glaring errors." Those errors are stated thusly:

1. Does a sewer right-of-way deed, prepared by the grantee, which recites that the real property through which the right-of-way…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Jefferson CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
  2. City of Birmingham v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Mobile Wrecker Owners v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Gober v. StubbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. City of Birmingham v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API