Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Bellflower Unified School District Governing Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 2013No. B247320PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, Acting P. J.

Bellflower Unified School District (District) appeals an order awarding attorney fees to Christina Garcia as the prevailing party in a proceeding under the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq.) (Act). The District contends Garcia is not the prevailing party because she achieved no significant success and created no public benefit. We conclude that the results that Garcia obtained through this litigation justify the finding that she prevailed. We therefore will affirm the fee order.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

1. Factual Background

Garcia is a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Haraguchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Connerly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Morcos v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. San Diegans for Open Government v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Pacific Merchant Shipping Assn. v. Bd.of Pilot Commissioners CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Delta Stewardship Council CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Delta Stewardship Council CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. HR Management v. County of Contra Costa CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API