Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Denari

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 2, 1937PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The question of interpretation, decision of which is here desired, concerns the meaning of the language employed in the gift of a portion of the remainder of a trust erected for the life benefit of the wife of the testator. The particular direction in question reads: “ One-third part or one-third share therein, I give, devise and bequeath to my son Eugene Denari, to and for his own use, his heirs and assigns, absolutely and forever.”

Eugene Denari survived the testator but predeceased the life beneficiary. He was survived by a widow and son as his only statutory distributees. The…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of BuechnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Fulton Trust Co. v. . PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. In Re the Accounting of TamargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. In Re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Villard v. . VillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. First and American National Bank v. HigginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  2. In re SpitzmullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. In re the Estate of BogartNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970
  4. Downing v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Gardner v. GardnerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API