Legal Opinion

Kloss v. E & H EARTHMOVERS

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 21, 1991No. C1-91-195PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

This case raises the question of how the federal social security disability offset against workers’ compensation benefits should be apportioned between two separate employers/insurers, both of whom are making workers’ compensation payments to an employee injured twice — once while working for each employer — and, as a result, is permanently and totally disabled. The workers’ compensation judge decided that the first employer/insurer is entitled to a deduction of two-thirds of the employee’s social security payment because the first employer had been determined to be two-thirds…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Haverland v. Twin City Milk Producers Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Koski v. Erie Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Bradley v. Vic's WeldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Goetz v. Bulk Commodity CarriersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Busch v. Advanced MaintenanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated WastewaterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  3. Sundby v. City of St. PeterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Allan v. R.D. Offutt Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated WastewaterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API