Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Vic's Welding
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 8, 1987No. C7-86-2163PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
The sole issue in this case is the compensation rate for temporary total and temporary partial disability under Minn.Stat. § 176.011, subd. 18. Employee, a heavy equipment operator hired for a short term job, claims entitlement to periodic compensation based on a weekly wage which includes overtime. The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA), by a majority decision, included overtime in the computation of the weekly wage, overturning a compensation judge’s determination that the employee’s weekly wage should be based on a 40-hour week. We reverse and reinstate the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Polaschek v. Asbestos Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Sawczuk v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Knotz v. Viking CarpetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Rath v. Perlman Rocque Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gary Ekdahl, Relator v. Independent School District 213, Self-Insured/Riverport Insurance ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Berry v. Walker Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Kelly v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Kloss v. E & H EARTHMOVERSSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Sundby v. City of St. PeterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.