Legal Opinion
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action Nos. JV-512600 and JV-512797
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 23, 1996No. 1 CA-JV 96-0034, 1 CA-JV 96-0020PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARBARINO, Judge.
This appeal presents four issues which we resolve against the juveniles. First, we hold that a juvenile can be required to submit to deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing based on a delinquent act occurring prior to the enactment of Arizona Revised Statutes Annofated (A.R.S.) sections 13-4438 and 31-281. Second, AR.S. sections 13-4438 and 31-281, which compel DNA testing, are constitutionally permissible and do not violate a juvenile’s right to privacy or right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. Third, the Arizona Constitution’s grant of exclusive…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- De Veau v. BraistedSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- State v. MaassSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- People v. GarvinIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. ScarboroughTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. GarvinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.