Legal Opinion
State v. Scarborough
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided August 28, 2006No. E2004-01332-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · ClarkCornelia A. Clark, J.
in which WILLIAM M. BARKER, C.J., E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., and JANICE M. HOLDER, JJ., joined.
We granted these appeals to determine whether the extraction of blood from a convicted and incarcerated felon for DNA analysis pursuant to Tennessee’s DNA collection statute, Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-321 (2003), is constitutional under both the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 7 of the Tennessee Constitution. These three cases come before us upon Defendant Scarborough’s interlocutory appeal from the denial of his motion to suppress…
3Cases cited53 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by69 opinions
- State v. BanksTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State of Tennessee v. Kacy Dewayne CannonTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. DayTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MeeksTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. TalleyTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.