Legal Opinion
Buescher v. Lastar
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 17, 1976No. Civ. 48316PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, P. J.
Respondent Buescher recovered a judgment against appellant Lastar for the full amount of a demand note which was barred by the statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 337) on the theoiy that a written acknowledgment of its continued validity as provided for by Code of Civil Procedure section 360 1 was made by appellant the maker of the note.
The facts as stipulated and found by the trial court cryptically summarized reflect that the note was made by appellant to respondent on September 10, 1965; no time for its payment was expressed therein; the statute of limitations…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- McCormick v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Rodgers v. ByersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Sterling v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Maurer v. BernardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wagner v. BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Gamble v. Northstore PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. VaronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Wagner v. BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Dawadi v. AdhikariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026