Evers v. Roder
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
In this personal injury case, the trial court denied defendant’s motion to exclude all testimony by plaintiffs expert regarding a form of pain management called “medial branch denervation” on the ground that the testimony was not supported by an adequate scientific foundation. The testimony occurred at a deposition. The first objection based on lack of foundation occurred approximately two weeks later, immediately before trial. The trial court overruled the objection. Plaintiff subsequently prevailed in a jury trial. Defendant appeals. We affirm.
Plaintiff suffered a neck injury in an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Jennings v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- White v. Jubitz Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. RitchieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012