Bennett v. Breuil Petroleum Corp.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Chancellor:
By his complaint, plaintiff, William H. Bennett, seeks to cancel stock issued under a plan adopted by the requisite statutory vote. Plaintiff claims the plan is illegal because it constitutes an oppressive exercise by the majority stockholder of an admitted legal right. Plaintiff further claims that the stock sold under the plan was sold for a grossly inadequate consideration.
*9This was originally an action between the plaintiff and corporate defendant to restrain the issuance of stock under the plan and to prevent the defendant corporation from treating the plaintiff’s option…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Sohland v. BakerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1927
- Allaun v. Consolidated Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1929
- Karasik v. Pacific Eastern Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1935
- Ellis v. Penn Beef Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Singer v. Magnavox Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Masinter v. Webco Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- Condec Corporation v. Lunkenheimer CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1967
- David J. Greene & Co. v. Dunhill International, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1968
- Warshaw v. CalhounSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.