Legal Opinion
W.C. v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Health and Human Services
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 5, 1987No. 86-3770PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING EN. BANC AND AMENDING OPINION
The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing, and Judges Browning and Beezer have voted to reject the suggestion for a rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for an en banc hearing, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. Fed.R.App.P. 35(b).
The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for a rehearing en banc is rejected.
The opinion filed on January 13, 1987, 807 F.2d 1502 (9th Cir.), is amended as follows:
Page 1505, first column, line 23: Correct to read…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- W.C. v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- 8 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 2055, 1980 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 24,790 in the Matter of Establishment Inspection of Stoddard Lumber Company, Inc., 1/4 Mile South of City of Yellowstone Highway, St. Anthony, Idaho, Petitioner v. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Barry v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
3Cited by11 opinions
- George L. Barry v. Otis R. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Paulsen v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Nash v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Nash v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- C.M. Higbee v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.