Legal Opinion
Barry v. Heckler
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 18, 1985No. C-83-6178-WHOPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ORRICK, District Judge.
The issue framed by the cross-motions for summary judgment in this supplementary security income (“SSI”) case brought by plaintiff, an unemployed carpenter, against defendant Margaret Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”), is whether plaintiff was assured due process in the manner in which his application for SSI benefits was reviewed. The Court holds that he was not, and that review program following the so-called Bellmon Amendment (hereafter the “Bellmon Review Program”) impermissibly infringed his due process rights. For the reasons…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- George L. Barry v. Otis R. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- W.C. v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- George L. Barry v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- W.C. v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Nesvold v. BowenDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988