Legal Opinion

Rucker v. Cox

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 1, 1940No. 4-5882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaefy, J.

Appellant purchased from R. W. But-

ler a used automobile. The seller accepted appellant’s title-retaining note for $72 evidencing- the balance of. the purchase price. In 1937, appellant was a sharecropper-on appellee’s farm. The appellee contended that his advances to appellant amounted to $200.00, and that in July the crop was abandoned by appellant. Appellee purchased the automobile note from Butler, and in October of the year in which the supplies account became due, he instituted an action of replevin in the justice of the peace court. The only written pleading by the plaintiff was an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hodges v. BayleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Douglas v. RumelinOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Patterson v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Floyd v. JacksonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Chapman v. ClaybrookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Valco FarmsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Rockefeller v. HogueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API