Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Rumelin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, C. J.

It is elementary that the decision of this court in any particular case becomes the law of that case: Hostetler v. Eccles, 112 Or. 572, 579 (230 Pac. 549). Assignments of error one and two raise the identical issue determined against defendants in the former appeal. That issue will not be further discussed, except to add that one who signs his name to a waiver on the back of a note may be both guarantor and indorser. The liabilities of a guarantor of negotiable paper are not.fixed by the Negotiable Instruments Law. There is nothing to prevent the same person being both guarantor and indorser:…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Noble v. Beeman-Spaulding-Woodward Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hostetler v. EcclesOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Rushing v. SaboeOregon Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Adskim v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Rabon v. PutnamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  3. Green Mountain Log Co. v. Columbia & Nehalem River RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Jenks Hatchery, Inc. v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Rucker v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API