Legal Opinion

Rourke v. Gerlach-Barklow Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 25, 1915No. 13840PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion byi

JARMAN, C.

The brief filed by plaintiff in error contains the following statement:

“The judgment is not supported by law or evidence.”

There is no specification of error, of which complaint is made, set out in the brief of the plaintiff in error, other than that the judgment is not supported by law or evidence. Presumably, this was an action on a contract, and the defendant, plaintiff in error here, contends that said contract was breached on the part of the plaintiff, defendant in error here, and for that reason the defendant is not liable. It is not pointed out in the brief wherein…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hocker v. RackleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Henderson v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. HarperWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Harrelson v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Cherry v. BoylesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API