Legal Opinion

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Harper

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1933No. 24456. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action was brought against these three parties upon the primary liability of Edwin Harper and the other two defendants as guarantors, to recover an indebtedness incurred by and on the part of Edwin Harper in the amount of $1,337.62, under a contract made with appellant. Edwin Harper made no appearance in the action, although he was produced as a witness by respondents, and the cause proceeded against the two guarantors.

The contract was entered into between the parties on about January 2,1926, to expire December 31,1926, unless sooner terminated by either party upon notice, as specified…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith Company v. DickinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Lilly-Brackett Co. v. SonnemannWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Alaska Pacific Navigation Co. v. Southwark Foundry & Machine Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. J. R. Watkins Co. v. PoagMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  5. J. R. Watkins Co. v. WaldoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Portland Ass'n of Credit Men, Inc. v. EarleyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Geerdes v. J. R. Watkins Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Procter & Gamble Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Top Line Equipment Co. v. National Auction Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API