Cherry v. Boyles

Plaintiff filed suit on note and chattel mortgage, to which defendant filed his answer and counterclaim, claiming plaintiff dispossessed him in violation of their agreement, that plaintiff wrongfully converted defendant’s crop, and for damages for breach of lease. The case was tried to a jury, with a verdict for defendant. The parties will 'be referred to as they appeared in the lower court.

The record discloses that plaintiff was the owner of a farm and store. Defendant and plaintiff entered into a contract whereby plaintiff rented defendant the farm under the following conditions: Plaintiff…