Legal Opinion
Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Strickland
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 12, 1959No. 37519, 37520PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carlisle, Judge.
Every suit must be prosecuted in the name of some person, either natural or artificial, and must be prosecuted against some person, either natural or artificial. Barbour v. Albany Lodge No. 24 F. & A. M., 73 Ga. 474. Where the suit is not prosecuted in the name of or against a natural person but in the name of or against a legal entity which either imports a corporation or a partnership, the failure to allege that the party in question is either a corporation or a partnership is an amendable defect. DeLeon v. Heller, Hirsch & Co., 77 Ga. 740; Saint Cecilia’s Academy v. Hardin,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barbour v. Albany Lodge, No. 24Supreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Smith v. Commissioners of Roads & RevenueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Saint Cecilia's Academy v. HardinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- DeLeon v. Heller, Hirsch & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
3Cited by6 opinions
- Northgate Village Apartments v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Professional Marine Co. v. Those Certain UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- PMC v. Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd'sCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Conroy v. Underwriters at Lloyds LondonDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2023
- Crawford v. SumerauCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.