DeLeon v. Heller, Hirsch & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Practice in Supérior Court. Attachment. Process. Partnership. Before Judge Harden. City Court of Sa vannah. May Term, 1886. Reported in the décision.
1Opinion of the Court
Jackson, Chief Justice.
The affidavit for attachment in this case is in these words: “That Heller, Hirsch & Company are indebted to *741deponent in the sum of four hundred and eighty-two dollars and twenty-five cents, and that said Heller, Hirsch & Company reside out of the State.” On motion, the writ of attachment was dismissed at the first term “for want of conformity of the attachment affidavit to law.” Two errors are assigned to this judgment: first, that it was premature, being rendered at • the first term ; and secondly, because the affidavit conforms sufficiently to the law, especially as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barbour v. Albany Lodge, No. 24Supreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Birdsong & Sledge v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
- Walter v. KiersteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Thompson v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
- Chambers, Jeffers & Co. v. Sloan, Hawkins & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1855
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Page v. Citizens Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Booth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Pless & SladeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Drucker & Brother v. Wellhouse & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Taylor v. FoldsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.