Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael Hocine Said

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 4, 2015No. 15–0641PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Chief Justice.

The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Dis-eiplinaiy Board charged attorney Michael Hocine Said with violating the rules of professional conduct for failing to communicate with his client, making a false statement to the court, and failing to comply with fee and trust account requirements. Following a hearing, the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa found Said violated several rules and recommended a thirty-day suspension. On our review, we find Said violated the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct and impose a thirty-day suspension.

I. Background Facts and Prior…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James C. Van GinkelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James A. Clarity IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. AplandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Royce D. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Heather Marie KingerySupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. David A. MorseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Eric Kenyatta ParrishSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Paul Arthur SilichSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API