Legal Opinion
Carnel v. Travelers Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 10, 1987No. C2-86-1616PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
This is an appeal of an order enjoining appellant The Travelers Insurance Company (Travelers) and the sheriffs of Dakota and Goodhue counties from taking any further action to terminate the interests of James and Mary Jo Carnel in the Camels’ farm property which was the subject of a mortgage and foreclosure sale. We reverse.
FACTS
Respondents James and Mary Jo Carnel defaulted on a mortgage held by Travelers which then instituted foreclosure proceedings under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 580 and purchased the property at the foreclosure sale on April 25, 1985.
On March…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Johnson v. First National Bank Of MontevideoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Blaisdell v. Home Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Anda Construction Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spaude v. State Bank of Gibbon (In Re Spaude)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
- Chai Misty Le v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Le)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2015