Harry v. Crescent Resources, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Judge.
Plaintiffs contend that they have a property right in the nature of “a negative appurtenant easement limiting the use of the Remnant Parcels to undeveloped open space” because their deeds, and those of their predecessors in title, describe their property with reference to the subdivision plat on which the four remnant parcels appear as open undeveloped space. We disagree, and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
An appurtenant easement is
an easement created for the purpose of benefitting particular land. This easement attaches to, passes with and is an incident of ownership of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shear v. Stevens Building Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Conrad v. West End Hotel & Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Cleveland Realty Company v. HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Spaugh v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Hawthorne v. Realty Syndicate, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Ingles Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Friends of Crooked Creek, L. L.C. v. C.C. Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Nelms v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Tanglewood Prop. Owners' Ass'n, Inc. v. IsenhourCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Cunningham v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.