Legal Opinion

People v. Carroll

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1963PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHyman Babshay, J.

The defendant moves to suppress and for the return of property seized under a search warrant. He contends that there was no probable cause for the issuance of the warrant; that the evidence seized under the warrant must be suppressed and returned because the statute under which the warrant was issued (Code Crim. Pro., § 792, subd. 4, as enacted by L. 1962, ch. 542), authorizing the seizure of “ property constituting evidence of crime or tending to show that a particular person committed a crime ”, is unconstitutional; finally, the defendant further contends that all things seized but not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. ThayerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. ChilliCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1966
  3. People v. MartinNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. SchwartzNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. McDonald, New York County Courts1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API