Legal Opinion

Tinney v. Willingham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 27, 1995No. 2-94-108-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LATTIMORE, Justice.

This is an appeal from an agreed judgment. In three points of error, appellant contends the judgment does not comport with the agreement reached by the parties, the trial court erroneously denied appellant a hearing on a motion for new trial, and there is no evidence to support the judgment. We hold that the trial court, by signing the judgment proposed by the appellees, altered the terms of the settlement agreement dictated into the record. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for a new trial.

This case originated when Christine…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. HydeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Reese v. PiperiTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Wyss v. BookmanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Vickrey v. American Youth Camps, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Delta Drilling Co. v. Cruz, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cherco Properties, Inc. v. Law, Snakard & Gambill, P.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Nuno v. Pulido, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  3. Goldman v. White Rose Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Dr. Kelly Isbell v. Jeanne Russell, Mission Street Consulting LLC, and Kate Rogers, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2022
  5. Putz Farms, a Joint Venture Dr. Herbert R. Putz And Signe Putz v. Crop Production Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API