Legal Opinion
Goldman v. White Rose Distributing Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 9, 1997No. 2-96-029-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIVINGSTON, Justice.
Appellant Ronald Goldman sued appellees White Rose Distributing Company, Sherwin Goldman, Carol Minker, Gayle Johansen, and Joe Hopkins for breach of contract because White Rose refused to pay Ronald money that he believed he was entitled to. White Rose counterclaimed, seeking actual and punitive damages from Ronald and claiming that he misused White Rose funds. During trial, White Rose made certain statements conceding that part of the money was, indeed, Ronald’s. After trial, White Rose refused to give Ronald the money.
Ronald filed this second suit to recover the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal SavingsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Borderlon v. PeckTexas Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- DeWoody v. RippleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Caprock Investment Corp. v. Montgomery, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2010
- Webb v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
- Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- In re LiaoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.