Legal Opinion

Lynn Ex Rel. Lynn v. Pinehurst Silk Mills, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence the defendant made motions in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below overruled these motions, and in this we can see no error.

On motion to dismiss or judgment of nonsuit, the evidence is to be taken in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and he is entitled to the benefit of every reasonable intendment upon the evidence and every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. An exception to a motion to dismiss in a civil action, taken after the close of the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Carpet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Womble v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Dail v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Ross v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Rawls v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beck v. Carolina Power and Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Teague v. Duke Power CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Beck v. Carolina Power and Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Calhoun v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. State v. . RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API