Calhoun v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1ConcurrenceSeawell, J.
The duty resting upon the master to warn a servant of danger under circumstances demanding it of a prudent man has a very prominent place in the law of master and servant, but it is by no means confined to that relation. Eor illustration, it also arises under the relation of bailor and bailee, and it will not be questioned that the bailee is often an independent contractor. No sound reason has ever been advanced why this duty should be confined to either of these relationships, or why it should be controlled by any other principle than that the one party, for his own or their mutual…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cashwell v. Fayetteville Pepsi-Cola Bottling WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Neal v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Mulford v. Cotton States Hotel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Hancock v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Matthews v. . CheathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.