Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Hoag

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 4, 1998No. C90-2477DR; CA A94763PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Wife appeals the modification of a dissolution judgment that reduced her monthly spousal support. On de novo review, ORS 19.205, we affirm.

The parties’ 18-year marriage was dissolved in July 1991. The parties had two children. On wife’s appeal from the dissolution judgment, the record showed that husband’s monthly income was $5,800 in tax-free disability insurance benefits and about $217 from coaching. Hoag and Hoag, 122 Or App 230, 232, 857 P2d 208 (1993). Wife, who had a high school education, had an income of $400 per month and was interested in going to college to become an elementary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In re the Marriage of HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Matter of Marriage of HoagCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. In re the Marriage of SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of MoserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. In re the Marriage of McArdleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. In re the Marriage of JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. In re the Marriage of HarlessCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API