Anderson v. Architectural Glass Construction, Inc. (In Re Pfister)
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1DissentShedd, Circuit Judge
I agree with the district court that there was a resulting trust in favor of Architectural Glass Construction (“AGC”). Under South Carolina law, a resulting trust is an equitable remedy designed “to effectuate the intent of the parties in certain situations where one party pays for property, in whole or in part, that for a different reason is titled in the name of another.” Bowen v. Bowen, 352 S.C. 494, 575 S.E.2d 553, 556 (2003). Here, there is a resulting trust in favor of AGC because the testimony re*301garding the intent of the parties is that Mrs. Pfister had mere legal title and that AGC is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jasco Tools, Inc. v. Dana Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Hayne Federal Credit Union v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- United States v. David SklenaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Robert Ridgway v. Ford Dealer Computer Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Bowen v. BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003