Legal Opinion
Bowen v. Bowen
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided January 13, 2003No. 25574PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice MOORE:
We granted this writ of certiorari to determine whether the Court of Appeals properly held that the presumption of a resulting trust should not be applied to the acquisition of land where Husband and Wife had an antenuptial agreement. Bowen v. Bowen, 345 S.C. 243, 547 S.E.2d 877 (Ct.App.2001). We affirm.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Previously, respondent (Wife) brought a divorce action against petitioner (Husband). The family court upheld Husband’s and Wife’s antenuptial agreement and held that four jointly titled properties acquired during the marriage were non-marital properties in which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hayne Federal Credit Union v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Lollis v. LollisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Legendre v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- McDowell v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re BrittainUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2010
- Anderson v. Architectural Glass Construction, Inc. (In Re Pfister)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Anderson v. Architectural Glass Construction, Inc. (In Re Pfister)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014