Legal Opinion

San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1914No. L.A. No. 3238PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Gavin W. Craig, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.-

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Appellant is the tenant of certain lands under a lease from the city of Long Beach, which lease acquires validity through a ratifying act of the legislature. It is, in legal contemplation, a lease by the state of certain of its tide and submerged lands. (San Pedro L. A. etc. Co. v. Hamilton, 161 Cal. 610, [37 L. R. A. (N. S.) 686, 119 Pac. 1073].) The city of Los Angeles assessed this leasehold and levied a tax thereon which by appellant was paid under protest. In due time appellant brought its action for the recovery of the tax. A general demurrer to its complaint was sustained and from the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Graciosa Oil Co. v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. San Pedro, L.A. & Salt Lake R.R. v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Boston Molasses Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Bakersfield & Fresno Oil Co. v. Kern CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District v. KlukkertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. de la Haba v. Tribunal de Contribuciones de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  5. Otter Tail Power Co. v. DegnanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API