Legal Opinion
George Clay Steam Fire Engine & Hose Co. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 10, 1994No. 2741 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIG, President Judge.
The George Clay Steam Fire Engine and Hose Company (the petitioner, hereinafter referred to as the “company”) appeals to this court from a decision and order of the Human Relations Commission that found the company in violation of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, Act of October 27, 1955, P.L. 744, as amended, 43 P.S. §§ 951-962.2 (the Act). The company asks that this court reverse the decision of the commission because the hearing examiner committed errors of law and fact. In addition, the company argues that the commission’s enabling legislation unconstitutionally…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lyness v. Com., State Bd. of MedicineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. SanfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Allegheny Housing Rehabilitation Corp. v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kennedy v. Upper Milford Township Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- McGlawn v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- The Municipality of Mt. Lebanon v. E. Gillen and PA Office of Open Records -- Appeal of: E. GillenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 261 v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Blue Comet Diner v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.