Legal Opinion

Legutko v. Local 816, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 5, 1988No. 962, Docket 87-9050PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESKILL, Circuit Judge:

In this action, we must determine whether certain causes of action claiming that a provision of a labor contract was executed and implemented in violation of a union constitution are time barred. Plaintiffs-appellants, employees or former employees of defendant-appellant Wallack Freight Lines (Wallack), assert several causes of action based upon the alleged improper ratification of a provision to a collective bargaining agreement between Wallack and defendant-appellee Local 816, International Brotherhood of Teamsters (Local 816). In a series of decisions, the United…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Donald Joseph Clift v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Bimler v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
  3. Ryder v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
  4. Ghartey v. St. John's Queens HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Ghartey v. St. John's Queens HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API