Legal Opinion
Ryder v. Philip Morris, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided November 27, 1996No. Civil Action 3:96cv519PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAYNE, District Judge.
Richard R. Ryder (“Ryder”) instituted this “hybrid action” against his employer and union under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185. Ryder alleges that Philip Morris, U.S.A. (“Philip Morris”) discharged him in violation of a collective bargaining agreement. He also alleges that the Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers International Union, Local Union 203-T (“Union”) breached its duty of fair representation by failing to fairly handle his grievance challenging the discharge. 1 (Notice of Removal, Exh. A. Motion for…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Nial Ruth Cox v. A. M. Stanton, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Yordán v. American Postal Workers UnionDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
- Linville v. UNITED AUTO WORKERS OF AMERICADistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2006
- Fonseca v. I.B.T. Teamsters Local Union 71District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022
- Harmon v. American Electric Power Service Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2005
- MVURI v. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERSDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019