BURGGRAF SERVICES, INC. v. H2O SOLUTIONS
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BRIAN JACK GOREE, Judge.
' ¶ 1 This is an appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing an action for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm because the contract at issue was with a Texas resident, it was entered into in Texas, it was performed in Texas, and there were insufficient contacts with Oklahoma to create in personam jurisdiction. Although the contract contained a forum selection clause specifying Tulsa County, Oklahoma, we conclude the provision was unreasonable under the circumstances of the present case.
I
Background
¶ 2 Burggraf Services, Inc. is a disaster restoration company.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Conoco Inc. v. Agrico Chemical CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Eads v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance SocietyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BURGGRAF SERVICES, INC. v. H2O SOLUTIONSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- OSBORN v. STIGERCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021