Legal Opinion
Conoco Inc. v. Agrico Chemical Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 9, 2004No. 99469PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
¶ 1 The dispositive questions on certiorari are: 1) Did The Williams Companies, Inc. properly invoke the doctrine of interstate forum non conveniens? and 2) Did the nonresident defendants have sufficient contacts with this state to be subject to the jurisdiction of our state courts? As to the first question, we find The Williams Companies, Inc. failed to present evidence that supports application of the doctrine of interstate forum non conveniens. As to the second question, we find Agrico Chemical Company had sufficient contacts with this state to subject it to the jurisdiction of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Gilbert v. Security Finance Corp. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Powers v. DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- TUCKER v. THE COCHRAN FIRM-CRIMINAL DEFENSE BIRMINGHAM L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Garnett v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Phillips v. HedgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.